Pssst! Hey, mate! Do you want to buy a dead body in pristine condition? Don't worry, it isn't very expensive. Plus if you're lucky, I'll throw in a 88-minute movie made in 2010 at no extra cost. You know. Like that one Directed by: John Landis; and Starring: Simon Pegg, Andy Serkis, Isla Fisher, Tim Curry, with Bill Bailey. Come on, pal. You know you want to.
Burke & Hare - The West Port Murders
THE REVIEW:
Burke & Hare - The West Port Murders
THE STORY:
Greetings, ladies and gentleman. I am Angus the Hangman (Bill
Bailey). And I would like to tell you an old Scottish story about the two Irish
entrepreneurs, William Burke and William Hare (Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis)
One day, after Hare's wife, Lucky (Jessica Hynes), discovers
that one of her lodgers has suddenly passed away, this downtrodden duo quickly comes
up with the idea that they can make some money by selling dead bodies to the
scholar, Doctor Robert Knox (Tom Wilkinson)
However, it is with great regret, that this bloodcurdling
task isn't always easy for Burke and Hare to perform. For a start, they have to
keep on asking themselves the all important question of how they can obtain
these deceased cadavers. Natural causes? Misadventure? Or murder? Plus in
addition to this, a local lady that goes by the name of Ginny (Isla Fisher), attempts
to swindle Burke out of his funds by staging the Scottish play, Macbeth.
Oh! And in a round about way you could also say exactly the
same thing about those gangsters too. Minus the 'play angle' of course.
But don't you worry you pretty little heads off, folks!
Cause as luck would have it, over time this money making venture seem to pan
out for Burke and Hare just fine. Going so far that Doctor Knox asks them to
step up their game, because he's hired some French chap to photograph the
sixteen corpses they've obtained for him, and he wants to present these
celluloid's to the King of England.
Still. That's most probably why what next transpires all
goes to Haggis when the Edinburgh Militia
begin to investigate a series of murders. As Professor Monro (Tim Curry) gets very
cross - you can't make some profit without some loss - a staged production
leads to a deadly shop - and at the end of the day, whilst one entrepreneur is
saved, the other one gets the chop.
Considering 'Burke and Hare' comprised of an all-star cast
of British comedians, complemented by an additionally brilliant comedic
director, I honestly would've thought that it would've been an awful lot funnier
than it actually was.
Now please don't get me wrong. I'm not trying to imply that
I didn't enjoy watching this movie at all. No. Of course not. Initially I got a
right kick out of how this filmic-farce was presented in a very English yet timely
fashion -- both aesthetically and tonally -- and appeared almost imitative of
the Laurel and Hardy films of old.
Also, I did appreciate following the developing and warm-ish partnership of Simon, Serkis, and Jessica, plus how their respective characters integrated themselves into the overall intriguing pretext.
Oh! And before I forget, I've got to mention loving those cameo appearances too! I mean, how can I not dig spotting the likes of Bill Bailey, Paul Whitehouse, Ronnie Corbett, Reece Shearsmith, and Steven Merchant, scattered throughout this flick!
Also, I did appreciate following the developing and warm-ish partnership of Simon, Serkis, and Jessica, plus how their respective characters integrated themselves into the overall intriguing pretext.
Oh! And before I forget, I've got to mention loving those cameo appearances too! I mean, how can I not dig spotting the likes of Bill Bailey, Paul Whitehouse, Ronnie Corbett, Reece Shearsmith, and Steven Merchant, scattered throughout this flick!
Having said that though, my one major problem with this
adventure was how its central narrative persistently got interrupted by a
number of obvious sub-plots barring its path. Inadvertently giving the film --
as a whole -- a somewhat timorous start / stop quality I've personally never
been very keen on.
Again, please don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to abate
any of the actors involved with these 'secondary sub-plots'. Cause if truth be
told, I do have a huge crush on Isla
Fisher, plus I've always looked forward to seeing Tim Curry or Tom
Wilkinson on screen. It's just that on a conceptual level these 'obvious
delays' were just that. Obvious delays. And in my eyes they held up the pace of
this adventure instead of allowing it to 'roll on' in a more innovative and
comical fashion.
Still. What the f*ck do I know, huh? I'm just another run of
the mill movie reviewer, and these are my filmic-facts. (1) 'Ealing Studios' first
released this $10 million dollar production on the 29th of October, 2010 , and managed to claw
back $4.3 million dollars at the box office. (2) Loosely translated, this
project was entitled 'Hands and Feet for Love' in Russia ,
and 'Cheater Bodies Themselves' in Greece .
(3) This was the first time in almost thirty years Jenny Agutter, David Schofield,
and John Woodvine, was directed by their former 'An American Werewolf in London '
cohort, John Landis. Also, this was the first flick John directed since being
out of the business for thirteen whole years. (4) The majority of this movie
was shot in London 's legendary, 'Ealing
Studios', as well as on location throughout numerous parts of the United
Kingdom . This includes Dashwood Mausoleum,
in West Wycombe ; Sevenoaks, in Kent ;
Luton Hoo Estate, in Bedfordshire; plus Edinburgh
and Stirling Castle ,
in Scotland .
(5) The tagline used to promote this picture, was, 'No Job Too Small. No Body
Too Big. No Questions Asked'. (6) This story was limply based on a series of
murders committed in Edinburgh , Scotland ,
in 1828. According to legend, the 'West Port Murders' were attributed to two Irish
immigrants, William Burke and William Hare, who sold the sixteen dead bodies they
'obtained' to a Doctor Robert Knox. Robert then dissected them in-front of his
medical students for anatomical purposes. (7) Way before pre-production, there
was a rumor circulating that stated John
Cleese and Dan
Aykroyd were going to play the two main leads in this film, or
alternatively, Colin Farrell and Ewan McGregor. (8) One of the main reasons
John Landis wanted to direct this movie, was because he saw it as an evil
version of a 'Laurel and Hardy' adventure.
All in all I'd say 'Burke and Hare' was more like 'Smirk and
Dare'. The comedy was funny, but not that funny. The pretext was daring, but
not that daring. And overall this movie is well worth a watch, especially if
you'd like to see a bastardized yet modern version of a Laurel
and Hardy film.
Nuff said.
THE RATING: B
BURKE AND HARE
Reviewed by David Andrews
on
April 09, 2014
Rating: