Whilst researching the following 71 minute movie made in 1953, I found out a very surprising fact about its Director, Ida Lupino. Because until this very day I never knew she was born in Camberwell, South East London, which is just a stones throw away from where I live. Hey! If you don't believe me, just ask any those Actors: Edmond O'Brien, Frank Lovejoy, and William Talman.
The Hitch-Hiker
The Hitch-Hiker
THE STORY:
Now do you see this gun I'm holding in my hand, fellers?
Well, guess what? If you don't do precisely what I say, exactly when I say it, I
make sure I will shoot you both dead on the spot.
So listen up. And listen up good. If I tell you to drive us
to New Mexico , Collins (Edmond
O'Brien), you bloody well drive us to New Mexico .
And if I tell you to turn on the radio so I can hear about my other crimes,
Gilbert (Frank Lovejoy), you just turn on that f*cking radio.
Granted, during our travels there may be a few occasions
where I will ask you to do other things for me. Like keeping your traps shut
for instance. Or making sure that no-one around us knows what the hell I'm up
to. But more or less, if you two saps obey my every wish, there's a good chance
-- and I do mean a fairly 'good chance' -- that the both of you just might get
out of this alive.
Then again, that's most probably why what next transpires
all takes a detour when Gilbert looks over at me and says, 'Hey Emmet (William
Talman)! I'm hungry. So can we please have something to eat now?'. As the Mexican
police are hot on the case - two sad looking hostages give good face - a driver
claps out within this long-winded race - and at the end of the day, oh dear, a
bad guy turns out to be a bloody disgrace.
THE REVIEW:
In my most humble opinion I'd say
'The Hitch-Hiker' is one of the most hard-boiled adventures I've seen for quite
some time. Essentially it tells the true-life tale of a psychopath that kidnaps
two men who are out on a road-trip together, and in so doing the three of them
end up in one hell of an expansive situation that's full of pitfalls, dilemmas,
Mexican policemen, and that sort of thing.
Admittedly, the situation wasn't so expansive that
the actors involved were able to enlarge upon their roles within its rather narrow pretext.
Having said that, though, the three of them still managed to highlight another side to there characters personalities, cause you could clearly see that one of them was the roguish
brute -- as played sublimely by William Talman -- another one was a more emotional
figure -- as played by the Burt Lancaster-esque Edmond O'Brien -- whilst the
third one was defiantly the paternal lead -- as played to a tea by Frank
Lovejoy.
Also, something else about this tale I would like to mention was
how it was rather bright and vivid upon the screen, bearing in mind it was
meant to be a film-noir. You see, normally this type of genre based production
has a more pronounced and contracting image, and not the sunny western styled
locations you see here. Not that this is a bad-bad thing, of course. It's just
that I found all those rustic locations weren't the sort of spectacle I'm generally
used to seeing. Again. Not a bad thing. Merely an observation at best.
Now the last thing I want to say about this great-great film
is how truly suspenseful it was to watch. Honestly, dear readers. There were
many a time throughout its telling I was mightily concerned about how this situation
would resolve itself. And do you know why I was concerned? Because the very cleaver writer who penned this piece made sure the main players encountered numerous 'pit-stops' during their travels, and this in turn elongated
the plot, allowed the characters to grow, as well as imbue the
overall narrative with an intrigue tone that built, and built, and built.
Anyway. I'm sure by now you've got the basic gist of what I
felt about this very fine film. So I tell you what. How about we take a
'pit-stop' of our own by checking out the following filmic-facts? (1) 'RKO' first
released this production in Boston , Massachusetts ,
on the exact same day Albert Einstein announced his revised 'unified field'
theory. It was on the 30th of March,
1953 . (2) Loosely translated, this project was entitled 'The Beast
of the Motorway' in Italy ;
'The Journey from Fear' in France ;
and 'Beware of Free Riders' in Finland .
(3) The majority of this movie was shot on location throughout the Californian
state of Alabama Hills, Lone Pine. (4) This story was based on a novel written
by the blacklisted writer, Daniel Mainwaring, who adapted it from a true story
about the psychopathic murderer called Billy Cook. (5) 'Premiere magazine'
ranked the poster for this movie 23rd out of "The 25 Best Movie Posters
Ever". (6) One of the taglines used to promote this picture, was, 'When was
the last time you invited death into your car?'. (7) In 1998 the 'United States
National Film Registry' decided to preserve this production, mainly because it
is seen as being the first film ever to be directed by a woman... Ida Lupino. However, according to some of my pals on facebook, Ida wasn't the first female film director, and this wasn't the first film she directed either. Lois Weber, Alice Guy-Blache, and Dorothy Arzner, among others, have also directed films before her. Plus lets not forget Ida was un-credited with her work on 'Not Wanted' and 'On Dangerous Ground'. (8) After this flick flipped its thumb, Edmond O'Brien starred in the drama, 'Man
in the Dark'; Frank Lovejoy starred in the horror-classic, 'House of Wax'; and
William Talman starred in the adventure, 'City That Never Sleeps'.
Overall I'd say 'The Hitch-Hiker' was a really great movie.
So if you're ever in a mood for a timely and suspenseful tale about lone gunmen
and kidnapped hostages, you know what you have to do. Watch this film and see
first hand how suspenseful it truly is.
Nuff said. Voom-Voom!
THE RATING: B+
THE HITCH-HIKER (1953)
Reviewed by David Andrews
on
November 10, 2014
Rating: